The reach of mobile towers that offer phone and data is vast now days, covering most of the western world. British people were some of the first to benefit from the new technology of 3G around a decade ago, but they are now among the last to gain access to 4G, lagging behind North America and most of western Europe. There have been numerous issues with 4G mobile UK, which has significantly slowed the desired roll-out.
When polled, most of UK citizens said that they sought 4G coverage, and they required it immediately. Although it is not clear from the survey whether the people asked were aware of the problems with the technology, 82% supported the urgent generation of greater 4G coverage. The reasons they referred to included keeping up with the rest of the world, and competing with international businesses.
4G simply means 4th generation. Currently, 4G appears to imply the bandwidth at 800 and 2100Mhz frequencies. These are the best frequencies for the purposes of mobile providers. However, the 800Mhz band is considerably better at building penetration and distance than the 2100Mhz band, but is already being utilised by several other devices.
If new 4G technology were installed, up to 10% of UK households situated near a 4G tower might have a good reception for their mobile phones, but lose all of their digital television access to free television stations. The towers could potentially interfere with the signal boosters that many people use to get free television channels in their homes. Filters used to reduce this interference are only a partial solution.
Paid television might also be affected, although people may, of course, select to switch to other options in these cases. However, there are some powerful companies behind paid TV now days, since it is such a massive business. This means that there are strong rivals standing in the way of rolling out 4G as it currently stands.
Some sharing of the spectrum has been accomplished by auctioning off the preferred wavelengths. Companies that have an interest in using them put up capital to 'own' the rights to that wavelength. Most of the competition for 4G airspace has actually been from among mobile providers. Some companies appear to be stalling in the hopes that several in-progress court cases will sort things out.
Trials with 4G are in progress in several cities in the UK by a number of large providers. However, they are not using the discussed frequencies at this time. The reason that the frequencies are so contested is that they facilitate bigger areas of coverage with less towers, and penetrate buildings better. Therefore, everyone wants the 'best' frequencies.
It is seemingly improbably that 4G will not come to the UK, but it seems it's going to take its own sweet time getting here. Large companies opposing each other via deals, auctions, deals, and more can take some time to get everything resolved. 4G mobile UK appears like a nuisance at the moment, but most people agree that the longer-term effects will be beneficial.
When polled, most of UK citizens said that they sought 4G coverage, and they required it immediately. Although it is not clear from the survey whether the people asked were aware of the problems with the technology, 82% supported the urgent generation of greater 4G coverage. The reasons they referred to included keeping up with the rest of the world, and competing with international businesses.
4G simply means 4th generation. Currently, 4G appears to imply the bandwidth at 800 and 2100Mhz frequencies. These are the best frequencies for the purposes of mobile providers. However, the 800Mhz band is considerably better at building penetration and distance than the 2100Mhz band, but is already being utilised by several other devices.
If new 4G technology were installed, up to 10% of UK households situated near a 4G tower might have a good reception for their mobile phones, but lose all of their digital television access to free television stations. The towers could potentially interfere with the signal boosters that many people use to get free television channels in their homes. Filters used to reduce this interference are only a partial solution.
Paid television might also be affected, although people may, of course, select to switch to other options in these cases. However, there are some powerful companies behind paid TV now days, since it is such a massive business. This means that there are strong rivals standing in the way of rolling out 4G as it currently stands.
Some sharing of the spectrum has been accomplished by auctioning off the preferred wavelengths. Companies that have an interest in using them put up capital to 'own' the rights to that wavelength. Most of the competition for 4G airspace has actually been from among mobile providers. Some companies appear to be stalling in the hopes that several in-progress court cases will sort things out.
Trials with 4G are in progress in several cities in the UK by a number of large providers. However, they are not using the discussed frequencies at this time. The reason that the frequencies are so contested is that they facilitate bigger areas of coverage with less towers, and penetrate buildings better. Therefore, everyone wants the 'best' frequencies.
It is seemingly improbably that 4G will not come to the UK, but it seems it's going to take its own sweet time getting here. Large companies opposing each other via deals, auctions, deals, and more can take some time to get everything resolved. 4G mobile UK appears like a nuisance at the moment, but most people agree that the longer-term effects will be beneficial.
No comments:
Post a Comment